Mandating com

26-Nov-2019 20:54

Those who are able should be expected to pay for time off work themselves.So wouldn’t it be better for the government to mandate paid leave only for low-income workers? But the important thing to remember about expanding parental leave through government action is that there is no way for the expansion to avoid burdening employers.They can bond with their child without having to worry about a steep reduction in household income.There’s evidence that parental leave can improve the health outcomes of children and mothers.

Combined with paid leave for other medical events, Clinton’s proposal carried an estimated price tag of 0 billion over 10 years.Employers would probably respond to the disruption in part by hiring fewer less-educated women of child-bearing age.This cost is no small thing, and should weigh heavily in your decision to support mandatory paid leave.Supporters say you have to offer paid leave to men because if you didn’t, then businesses would discriminate against women in hiring, promotion and compensation.But just because it’s offered to men doesn’t mean men will use it to the same extent as women.

Combined with paid leave for other medical events, Clinton’s proposal carried an estimated price tag of 0 billion over 10 years.

Employers would probably respond to the disruption in part by hiring fewer less-educated women of child-bearing age.

This cost is no small thing, and should weigh heavily in your decision to support mandatory paid leave.

Supporters say you have to offer paid leave to men because if you didn’t, then businesses would discriminate against women in hiring, promotion and compensation.

But just because it’s offered to men doesn’t mean men will use it to the same extent as women.

Lower-income workers with less education are much less likely to have access to paid leave than workers with more skills and higher incomes.